Why plane crashes feel scarier than car accidents
Educational Content: This information is for learning purposes only. It is not professional medical or mental health advice. If you need help, please talk to a qualified professional.
Quick Summary
Your brain judges how likely something is based on how easily you can recall examplesânot on actual statistics. Dramatic, recent, or emotional events feel more common than they actually are.
What Is It?
The availability heuristic is a mental shortcut where you estimate the probability or frequency of something based on how easily examples come to mind. If you can quickly think of instances of something happening, your brain assumes it must be common.
This is why people fear shark attacks more than vending machine accidents, even though vending machines kill more people annually. Shark attacks are dramatic, covered extensively in media, and emotionally memorableâso examples are readily available in your mind. Vending machine deaths are boring and unreportedâso examples do not come to mind easily. Your brain mistakes availability for probability.
Real-Life Example: The Scared Flyer
After watching news coverage of a plane crash, Meera becomes terrified of flying. She books a 6-hour train journey instead of a 1-hour flight for her upcoming trip. Statistically, she is far more likely to die in a car accident on the way to the train station than in a plane crash. But the plane crash is vivid in her memoryâshe can picture it clearly, recall victims names, remember the dramatic footage.
Car accidents happen every day but do not make headlines unless spectacular. Because plane crash examples are easily available in her mind, her brain judges flying as extremely dangerous. Meanwhile, her friend Dev, who just watched a documentary about car crash statistics, suddenly feels nervous driving but fine flyingâhis recent exposure made car crashes more mentally available. Both are making decisions based on availability, not actual risk.
How to Recognize It
⨠What Gets Unlocked When You Overcome This
When you recognize and counter the availability heuristic, you start making decisions based on actual probabilities rather than mental availability. You check statistics before judging risk. You notice when media coverage is making something feel more common than it is. You realize that just because you cannot recall examples does not mean something is rareâand vice versa.
Your anxiety decreases because you stop overestimating unlikely dangers. You take appropriate precautions for actual risks instead of dramatic but rare ones. You consume media more critically, recognizing that news coverage creates availability but not necessarily reality. You invest resourcesâtime, money, worryâproportional to actual rather than perceived risk.
You become harder to manipulate through fear-based messaging because you can distinguish between availability and probability. Your worldview becomes more accurate and less fearful. You make better decisions about: health (focusing on common risks like diet and exercise rather than rare diseases), safety (wearing seatbelts rather than fearing plane crashes), finances (insuring against likely events rather than dramatic ones), and relationships (not judging groups based on memorable examples).
Most importantly, you regain agencyâyour decisions are based on reality, not on what media chose to make available to you.
Want to Dive Deeper?
You have gained the core understanding. Continue below for deeper exploration including psychological mechanisms, diverse perspectives, hands-on exercises, and research references.
Deep Dive
Comprehensive exploration for deeper understanding
Understanding the Impact
Short-term
You make fear-based decisions that are not proportional to actual risk. You might avoid activities that are statistically safe while engaging in genuinely risky behaviors without concern. You experience anxiety about unlikely events while ignoring probable dangers. You waste money on unnecessary precautions against dramatic but rare risks.
Long-term
Chronic availability-based thinking leads to a distorted worldview. You overestimate dangers that are covered in media and underestimate dangers that are not. This causes: misallocation of resources (spending on security against unlikely threats while ignoring health risks), chronic anxiety (feeling the world is more dangerous than it is), missed opportunities (avoiding beneficial but fear-triggering activities), poor financial decisions (buying insurance for unlikely events, not saving for probable ones), and voting for policies that address available rather than actual problems. Your perception of reality diverges further from actual reality over time, especially if you consume fear-based media.
The Psychology Behind It
Your brain evolved to make fast decisions with limited information. In ancestral environments, if you could easily recall instances of somethingâ"I have seen many poisonous snakes"âit probably meant that thing was genuinely common in your environment. The availability heuristic worked well. But modern media breaks this system.
You are exposed to dramatic events from around the worldâplane crashes, terrorist attacks, shark attacks, kidnappingsâmaking these rare events highly available in memory. Your brain was not designed for this global information feed. It still uses availability as a proxy for frequency, leading to systematic misjudgments. Factors that increase availability: recency (just happened), vividness (dramatic, emotional), personal relevance (happened to someone like you), and media coverage (repeated exposure).
This is why after a celebrity dies from a disease, donations to that disease skyrocketâit became mentally available.
At the Subconscious Level
Your subconscious uses availability as a quick-and-dirty risk assessment tool. " If yesâdanger signal. If noâprobably safe. This happens in milliseconds, before conscious analysis.
" Both trigger the same danger response. Additionally, your brain has a negativity biasâthreatening information is more memorable than neutral information. This compounds the availability problem: dramatic negative events are both more available and weighted more heavily in decision-making.
Indirect Effects
- â˘Media consumption shapes your risk perception more than actual statistics
- â˘You fear rare dramatic deaths (terrorism, plane crashes) while ignoring common mundane risks (heart disease, car accidents)
- â˘Recent events disproportionately influence your decisions (one local crime makes whole neighborhood feel dangerous)
- â˘You are vulnerable to fear-based manipulation (politicians and marketers exploit availability)
- â˘You spread fear-based information, increasing availability for others (sharing scary news amplifies the effect)
- â˘Your worldview becomes increasingly pessimistic if you consume negative news regularly
Related Topics
Why we only see information that agrees with what we already believe
Your brain looks for proof that you're right and ignores proof that you're wrong.
Why beginners feel like experts and experts doubt themselves
The paradox where people with little knowledge think they know everything, while true experts are full of self-doubt.
Found this helpful?
Consider sharing this with others who might benefit from understanding this topic.
Explore More Topics